Description:
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From a renowned National Book Award–winning scholar, an extraordinary new account of the life of Jesus that explores the mystery of how a poor young man inspired a religion that reshaped the world.
“This a brilliant and necessary book. Sober, wise, respectful, and fearless." —Jon Meacham, author of The Soul of America
"Pagels’ story is for believers and non-believers alike.” —Tara Westover, author of Educated
"The depth of spirituality she uncovers is profound.” —The New York Times Book Review
Early in her career, Elaine Pagels changed our understanding of the origins of Christianity with her work in The Gnostic Gospels. Now, in the culmination of a decades-long career, she explores the biggest subject of all, Jesus. In Miracles and Wonder she sets out to discover how a poor young Jewish man inspired a religion that shaped the world.
The book reads like a historical mystery, with each chapter addressing a fascinating question and answering it based on the gospels Jesus's followers left behind. Why is Jesus said to have had a virgin birth? Why do we say he rose from the dead? Did his miracles really happen and what did they mean?
The story Pagels tells is thrilling and tense. Not just does Jesus comes to life but his desperate, hunted followers do as well. We realize that some of the most compelling details of Jesus's life are the explanations his disciples created to paper over inconvenient facts. So Jesus wasn't illegitimate, his mother conceived by God; Jesus's body wasn't humiliatingly left to rot and tossed into a common grave—no, he rose from the dead and was seen whole by his followers; Jesus isn't a failed messiah, his kingdom is a metaphor: he lives in us. These necessary fabrications were the very details and promises that electrified their listeners and helped his followers' numbers grow.
In Miracles and Wonder, Pagels does more than solve a historical mystery. She sheds light on Jesus's enduring power to inspire and attract.
“This a brilliant and necessary book. Sober, wise, respectful, and fearless." —Jon Meacham, author of The Soul of America
"Pagels’ story is for believers and non-believers alike.” —Tara Westover, author of Educated
"The depth of spirituality she uncovers is profound.” —The New York Times Book Review
Early in her career, Elaine Pagels changed our understanding of the origins of Christianity with her work in The Gnostic Gospels. Now, in the culmination of a decades-long career, she explores the biggest subject of all, Jesus. In Miracles and Wonder she sets out to discover how a poor young Jewish man inspired a religion that shaped the world.
The book reads like a historical mystery, with each chapter addressing a fascinating question and answering it based on the gospels Jesus's followers left behind. Why is Jesus said to have had a virgin birth? Why do we say he rose from the dead? Did his miracles really happen and what did they mean?
The story Pagels tells is thrilling and tense. Not just does Jesus comes to life but his desperate, hunted followers do as well. We realize that some of the most compelling details of Jesus's life are the explanations his disciples created to paper over inconvenient facts. So Jesus wasn't illegitimate, his mother conceived by God; Jesus's body wasn't humiliatingly left to rot and tossed into a common grave—no, he rose from the dead and was seen whole by his followers; Jesus isn't a failed messiah, his kingdom is a metaphor: he lives in us. These necessary fabrications were the very details and promises that electrified their listeners and helped his followers' numbers grow.
In Miracles and Wonder, Pagels does more than solve a historical mystery. She sheds light on Jesus's enduring power to inspire and attract.
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Pagels, rehabilitating aspects of Christianity on terms that a secular scholar can respect, revels in the contradictions and the inconsistencies not as flaws to be explained away but as signs of the faith’s capaciousness.” —Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker
“The ‘quest’ for Jesus . . . has taken on many forms. Pagels takes the historical approach. . . . The depth of spirituality she uncovers is profound.” —The New York Times Book Review
"[Pagels's] vast knowledge has always been tempered by deep humility. . . . [Here is] an opportunity to hurry along with a scholar of tremendous graciousness and think together about some of the most profound and inspiring stories ever told. Regardless of what you believe -- or don't believe -- this is an author hoping to convince you of nothing but the "outburst of hope" conveyed by the multitudinous voices of Jesus's early followers." —The Washington Post
"Using the tools of the historian as well as the literary critic, she tries to unearth the [gospel] writers’ concerns and influences. . . . recontextualizing the old stories gives them an unexpected poignancy." —The Atlantic
"Miracles and Wonder explores mysteries about Jesus with detective zeal. . . . illuminating and essential work." —Los Angeles Times
“Pagels’s book advances a refreshingly honest reminder about why the stories of Jesus . . . haven’t gone away.” —Los Angeles Review of Books
"[T]his title is notable not just for the depth and breadth of Pagel’s scholarship but for the way she becomes part of the story. There is almost a yearning to her quest for answers that personalizes her writing. . . . Part history, part mystery, all enlightening." —Booklist (starred review)
"No matter how familiar readers are with the gospels, the stories Pagels has woven together offer new takes on who Jesus was and what it means to bring facts to faith with clarity and curiosity." —Library Journal
“Few scholars on the planet have entranced, enthralled, and educated readers about early Christianity as much as Elaine Pagels. Now she turns her gaze to the very core of the Christian faith, the mysterious life of Jesus himself. Miracles and Wonders will delight readers with Pagels’ endless curiosity, keen insights, and poignant reflections.” —Bart D. Ehrman, author of Misquoting Jesus and host of the Misquoting Jesus podcast
“This a brilliant and necessary book. Sober, wise, respectful, and fearless, Elaine Pagels’ account of her exploration into the history and meaning of Jesus is akin to having a long, rich, and illuminating conversation with a friend who has read everything and is eager to share what she’s learned.” —Jon Meacham, author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, The Soul of America
“Provocative, gracious, reverent: a great historian of religion gives us an account of the life of Jesus, one of history's most towering figures. Scholarly and inquisitive, but also contemplative and respectful, Pagels’ story is for believers and non-believers alike.” —Tara Westover, author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, Educated
“With her vast learning worn lightly, easily, Elaine Pagels offers a luminous and profound historical meditation on Jesus and the gospels. Interpreting a jumble of ancient sacred stories with utmost care and respect, she discerns the patterns that finally bring hope and even redemption to an afflicted world -- a major reason these stories live and inspire faith.” —Sean Wilentz, George Henry Davis 1886 Professor of American History at Princeton University
“With Miracles and Wonder, Elaine Pagels, one of our nation’s greatest historians of religion, has penned an intimate and deeply researched history of the life and significance of Jesus. With clarity and care, she unsettles and reorients the reader. She shows us that the enduring power of Jesus rests in the “outburst of hope” that emanates from the stories about him. Hope we so desperately need in our own dark and trying times.” —Eddie S. Glaude, Jr., author of Begin Again: James Baldwin’s America and Its Urgent Lessons for Our Own
“The ‘quest’ for Jesus . . . has taken on many forms. Pagels takes the historical approach. . . . The depth of spirituality she uncovers is profound.” —The New York Times Book Review
"[Pagels's] vast knowledge has always been tempered by deep humility. . . . [Here is] an opportunity to hurry along with a scholar of tremendous graciousness and think together about some of the most profound and inspiring stories ever told. Regardless of what you believe -- or don't believe -- this is an author hoping to convince you of nothing but the "outburst of hope" conveyed by the multitudinous voices of Jesus's early followers." —The Washington Post
"Using the tools of the historian as well as the literary critic, she tries to unearth the [gospel] writers’ concerns and influences. . . . recontextualizing the old stories gives them an unexpected poignancy." —The Atlantic
"Miracles and Wonder explores mysteries about Jesus with detective zeal. . . . illuminating and essential work." —Los Angeles Times
“Pagels’s book advances a refreshingly honest reminder about why the stories of Jesus . . . haven’t gone away.” —Los Angeles Review of Books
"[T]his title is notable not just for the depth and breadth of Pagel’s scholarship but for the way she becomes part of the story. There is almost a yearning to her quest for answers that personalizes her writing. . . . Part history, part mystery, all enlightening." —Booklist (starred review)
"No matter how familiar readers are with the gospels, the stories Pagels has woven together offer new takes on who Jesus was and what it means to bring facts to faith with clarity and curiosity." —Library Journal
“Few scholars on the planet have entranced, enthralled, and educated readers about early Christianity as much as Elaine Pagels. Now she turns her gaze to the very core of the Christian faith, the mysterious life of Jesus himself. Miracles and Wonders will delight readers with Pagels’ endless curiosity, keen insights, and poignant reflections.” —Bart D. Ehrman, author of Misquoting Jesus and host of the Misquoting Jesus podcast
“This a brilliant and necessary book. Sober, wise, respectful, and fearless, Elaine Pagels’ account of her exploration into the history and meaning of Jesus is akin to having a long, rich, and illuminating conversation with a friend who has read everything and is eager to share what she’s learned.” —Jon Meacham, author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, The Soul of America
“Provocative, gracious, reverent: a great historian of religion gives us an account of the life of Jesus, one of history's most towering figures. Scholarly and inquisitive, but also contemplative and respectful, Pagels’ story is for believers and non-believers alike.” —Tara Westover, author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, Educated
“With her vast learning worn lightly, easily, Elaine Pagels offers a luminous and profound historical meditation on Jesus and the gospels. Interpreting a jumble of ancient sacred stories with utmost care and respect, she discerns the patterns that finally bring hope and even redemption to an afflicted world -- a major reason these stories live and inspire faith.” —Sean Wilentz, George Henry Davis 1886 Professor of American History at Princeton University
“With Miracles and Wonder, Elaine Pagels, one of our nation’s greatest historians of religion, has penned an intimate and deeply researched history of the life and significance of Jesus. With clarity and care, she unsettles and reorients the reader. She shows us that the enduring power of Jesus rests in the “outburst of hope” that emanates from the stories about him. Hope we so desperately need in our own dark and trying times.” —Eddie S. Glaude, Jr., author of Begin Again: James Baldwin’s America and Its Urgent Lessons for Our Own
About the Author
ELAINE PAGELS is the Harrington Spear Paine Professor of Religion at Princeton University. In 2015 she received the National Humanities Medal from President Barack Obama, and earlier in her career was awarded a Rockefeller, Guggenheim, and MacArthur fellowship in consecutive years. As a young researcher at Barnard College, she changed the historical landscape of the Christian religion by exploding the myth of the early Church as a unified movement. Her findings were published in the bestselling book The Gnostic Gospels (1979), which won both the National Book Critics Circle Award and the National Book Award. Her subsequent books include Why Religion? Revelations, Reading Judas, Beyond Belief, The Origin of Satan, and Adam, Eve, and the Serpent. She has been profiled in Time, The Atlantic, Vogue, The New Yorker, and Newsweek's issue "Women and Power."
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
1
The Virgin Birth: What Happened?
Jesus’s Family and the Circumstances of His Birth
Perhaps the most unusual feature of the gospel stories is the virgin birth: What might it mean? How do the gospel writers say that it happened, and why? When I first started to ask these questions, I found many surprises. I’d always assumed that there was only one birth story, having seen different versions merged into one on Christmas Eve in our small Methodist church in California, when we acted out the children’s pageant, dressed as angels crowned with sparkling halos, or shepherds or kings with paper crowns, arriving to greet the baby Jesus, a doll cradled by the girl who’d scored the role of Mary. But when I went back to investigate the birth story, I was amazed to see that, although the New Testament gospels of Matthew and Luke agree that Jesus was a royal prince, born in Bethlehem, and that heavenly signs announced his birth, at nearly every other point each tells a very different story.
I was also surprised to see that the earliest written narrative of Jesus’s life in the Bible, the Gospel of Mark, tells us nothing about the circumstances of his birth, and nearly nothing about his family background. The same is true of the last of the four New Testament gospels, the Gospel of John, but the other two, the Gospel of Luke and the Gospel of Matthew, tell us a great deal, each offering many details.
Both Luke and Matthew start by telling of Jesus’s family and lineage, and relating the circumstances of his birth and youth. Each offers a genealogy that traces Jesus’s paternal descent from his father, Joseph, to Israel’s royal dynasty, back to King David, circa 1000 b.c.e. As we’ve noted, both locate Jesus’s birth in Bethlehem, the city native to Israel’s kings. Both also claim that Jesus’s parents received divine visions about their future child and his destiny—heavenly signs, astrological portents that signified the arrival of a divinely appointed “Son of God.” Most amazing of all, both Matthew and Luke insist that Jesus’s birth involved a miracle unprecedented in the history of the world—a “virgin birth.”
To understand what each writer has in mind, we need to read these stories separately. Matthew begins by announcing that Jesus is God’s chosen Messiah, setting forth a genealogy that shows his descent from Israel’s greatest kings, David and Solomon. Then he tells how magi, astrologers from foreign lands, alerted by the appearance of a new star signaling the birth of a future king, travel to Jerusalem bearing royal gifts to honor the newborn prince. But news of the birth of a potential rival terrifies the reigning king, Herod the Great. After convening his entire court, he summons the foreign ambassadors, ordering them to find the child and return to tell Herod how to locate him.
Although a familiar story in Luke’s gospel pictures Jesus’s parents traveling to Bethlehem, seeking an inn, and finding none, Matthew, surprisingly, says that his parents had a house in Bethlehem, ancestral city of the Davidic dynasty. Then, he says, the heavenly sign, the Christmas star, led the magi to their home (Matthew 2:10). Overwhelmed with joy, they enter the house and, seeing the child with Mary, his mother, kneel down to pay homage, opening their treasure chests to offer gold, frankincense, and myrrh. But after they secretly depart from Jerusalem, eluding Herod, the enraged king orders his soldiers to slaughter all male Jewish babies under the age of two—a fate Jesus escapes only because his father, Joseph, immediately takes his family into hiding in Egypt. Only later, after hearing of Herod’s death, does Joseph dare return with his wife and child. But, fearing that Herod’s son and successor also might threaten the child’s life, Joseph moves the holy family from their home in Bethlehem to a rural town in Galilee, where they live incognito until Jesus grows up. As Matthew tells it, this explains why, instead of being recognized as a prince, he is known simply as Jesus of Nazareth (2:22–23).
Luke, too, says a lot about Jesus’s family and birth; but, as we’ve noted, he tells quite a different story. Instead of a royal birth heralded by a divine sign recognized by kings and rulers throughout the world, Luke mentions no star, and no public alarm. Instead, he pictures a pregnant young woman from a rural family, who went into labor while traveling away from home. Having nowhere else to stay in Bethlehem, she and her husband took shelter in a barn, and Jesus’s mother had to give birth in a manger; only local herdsmen took note of what happened. But since Luke, like Matthew, insists that Jesus’s father was related to Israel’s royal dynasty, he says that Mary and Joseph had traveled to Bethlehem, claiming that members of that family were required to pay Roman taxes there.
As Luke tells it, Mary, astonished when the angel Gabriel appears to her to say that she is about to become pregnant, exclaims, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” Reading Luke’s account as an adult raised questions that hadn’t occurred to me before. Many Christians love and revere Mary, not only as “Mother of God” but also as someone whose loving-kindness and purity Christian women might seek to emulate. But now, rereading Luke’s story, I had to consider other possibilities. What if we suspend, for a moment, the happy fiction Luke presents, and consider how a young woman receiving such a message might actually respond? Isn’t it likely that a girl with no sexual experience might be startled and dismayed to hear that she is about to become pregnant, given the potential embarrassment and shame she might suffer? Luke is a writer who, unlike Matthew, focuses on Mary, and wants us to imagine her surprised and delighted. Yet the dialogue he puts in her mouth suggests that she is overwhelmed and simply acquiesces, declaring, “I am the Lord’s slave; so be it” (Luke 1:38). Luke’s choice of words, the Greek doulē, “slave,” is often translated into softer terms, like “servant” or the English word “handmaiden.” But those hearing this story in Luke’s time would likely know that an enslaved woman was required to obey a master’s will, even when that meant bearing his child, as it often did. Luke intends to show, however, that the Lord himself could turn a burden into a blessing, even for Mary.
For over two thousand years, Christians throughout the world have merged the two stories into one, to create a composite version that ignores their discrepancies. For, although both birth stories agree on three points—Jesus’s lineage, the location in Bethlehem, a miraculous birth—there the similarities end and difficulties begin. And although historians have sought for millennia to verify details of these stories, they have found none—none for Matthew’s claim of an unusual astronomical sign; none for any historical record that hints at a massive slaughter of Jewish babies; and none to validate Luke’s claim that Jesus’s family would have had to pay Roman taxes in Bethlehem. So, when the Roman Catholic scholar Raymond Brown considers the “star” Matthew mentions, he notes that, though ancient Babylonian astrologers “might have associated a particular star with the King of the Jews,” there are no records of such an event, or even of such a prediction. Brown does suggest that many of Matthew’s contemporaries might have accepted his account, since Roman biographers often associated the sighting of special astronomical signs with the births of great rulers. For example, a silver coin honoring Julius Caesar (c. 40 b.c.e.) portrays him with a special star that signals his divine destiny.
In the seventeenth century, European scientists began to sift through evidence of unusual celestial events, seeking scientific evidence for the “star.” The astronomer Johannes Kepler suggested that it must have been a supernova, although there is no record of one from that time. Others have suggested that the star may have been a comet, perhaps Halley’s Comet, which appeared in 12 b.c.e. Later, however, when Kepler sighted a conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn, he noted that the same conjunction, predicted to occur every 805 years, may have happened in 7 b.c.e., when it appeared in the constellation Pisces, and so may have been the Christmas star—a view that some endorse to this day.
Yet, since such speculation is far from conclusive, literary scholars suggest instead that, rather than speaking of astronomical “facts,” Matthew assimilated into his narrative the poetic language of such prophets as Isaiah. Writing six hundred years before Jesus’s birth, Isaiah envisioned that when the “day of the Lord” dawned, Gentiles would travel to the holy land of Israel, bearing “the wealth of the nations,” along with camels and flocks of sheep, bringing offerings of “gold and frankincense” to honor the dawning of the “great light” of God’s glory (Isaiah 60:1–7) . If that is what prompts Matthew to write the “Christmas star” into his birth narrative, his likely intention is not to deceive his audience into believing something that didn’t happen. Instead, convinced that Jesus was, indeed, God’s promised Messiah, Matthew may have assumed that events coinciding with his birth would have fulfilled ancient prophecies. And since Matthew intended not only to write a narrative of Jesus’s life but above all to show the meaning of his birth and his life, he may well have adopted Isaiah’s metaphor, picturing Jesus’s birth as the light of a new dawn.
What about Matthew’s claim that King Herod ordered his soldiers to slaughter Jewish babies? As noted, historians of the early Roman Empire have searched in vain for any hint of such a government-ordered massacre. Yet Herod was famous for his cruelty, which may have made such a story sound plausible. When he suspected two of his sons, Alexander and Aristobulus, of plotting against him, Herod ordered his executioners to kill them both; he had previously executed their mother, Mariamne, his favorite wife, under similar charges. After that, a popular saying mocked his professed refusal to eat nonkosher food: “Better to be Herod’s pig than his son!” Nevertheless, nearly all historians agree that the unprecedented mass killing that Matthew claims to report could not have occurred without any trace remaining in Jewish or Roman historical records.
Instead, here again, as in the case of the “Christmas star,” many scholars agree that Matthew models his story of Jesus’s birth on literary precedent—on famous passages in the Hebrew Bible, to suggest, for example, that, just as the infant Moses escaped the Egyptian pharaoh’s mass slaughter of Jewish babies, so the infant Jesus barely escaped a similar massacre under King Herod (Matthew 2:8–18). As for the third event, which Luke reports—that Mary and Joseph had to travel to Bethlehem to register for taxes—historians of Rome note that, although Roman rulers did inflict severe taxes on Jews around the time of Jesus’s birth, they imposed no such travel requirement. So, here again, literary scholars join the discussion, suggesting that Luke includes this detail in order to move Jesus’s parents from their home in Nazareth to Bethlehem in time for his birth, to fulfill the Hebrew Bible prophecies of a Messiah’s birthplace.
Matthew’s and Luke’s birth narratives, then, likely contain more literary adaptation of Hebrew Bible stories than history. This similarity between their gospels shows that, although the New Testament writers often mention historical events, they were not writing primarily to report history, or even biography—not, at any rate, in ways that conform to Greek and Roman literary conventions. Instead, they were writing, some forty to seventy years after Jesus’s death, primarily to publicize his message. Simply put, Jesus’s devoted believers wrote these narratives to persuade others to “believe in the gospel”—the Greek term euangelion translates as “good news”—and join their new movement.
The gospels, then, have that motivation in common. But when we think of these writings as less than factual, written, in effect, as propaganda for the movement (intending that term as descriptive, not pejorative), we begin to question startling discrepancies between them. The earliest written sources that mention Jesus—the letters of Paul, and the New Testament gospels—all mention his mother. But apart from the two birth stories we’ve noted in Matthew and Luke, only John’s gospel briefly mentions Joseph as Jesus’s father. Neither Paul nor Mark ever mentions Joseph’s name, and neither mentions any human father. Noting this absence, Professor Raymond Brown has speculated that Joseph is not a historical figure. He suggests instead that Matthew may have patterned what he writes of Joseph’s receiving messages from angels in his dreams on the Hebrew Bible story of Joseph “the dreamer,” told in Genesis 37. But if Joseph was not Jesus’s father, who was? As we shall see, many respected scholars regard the birth stories primarily as legends woven from Biblical stories in order to deflect that embarrassing question.
The mystery begins with Jesus’s genealogy. We’ve noted that Matthew begins his account with one genealogy, and Luke adds another—which raises questions we need to investigate. Both claim to trace Jesus’s lineage back to King David, but when we compare them, we cannot help noting that these two accounts clash from the start. Immediately after mentioning Joseph as Jesus’s father, each names a different man as Jesus’s paternal grandfather; and after that, the two genealogies continue to diverge at nearly every turn (Matthew 1:1–18; Luke 3:23–38). Finally, whereas Matthew claims to trace Jesus’s lineage back to Abraham, Luke goes further, claiming to trace it back to Adam, ancestor of the human race, whom he calls “son of God”—a term he also applies to Jesus.
A confusing genealogy is one thing; the bigger question is, why do both writers insist on Jesus’s “virgin birth”? Matthew admits that Joseph himself found this claim so outrageous that when he discovered that his future bride was pregnant, and not with his child, he immediately decided to break the marriage contract (Matthew 1:18–19). At this point in Luke’s story, however, he mentions nothing of marital discord. On the contrary, Luke wants to interpret what happened as miraculous, an enormous blessing. As he tells it, a young girl who “has never known a man” suddenly, astonishingly, discovers that God has graced her with a unique role in human history. Bursting with joy, she begins to sing a song of praise to God.
The Virgin Birth: What Happened?
Jesus’s Family and the Circumstances of His Birth
Perhaps the most unusual feature of the gospel stories is the virgin birth: What might it mean? How do the gospel writers say that it happened, and why? When I first started to ask these questions, I found many surprises. I’d always assumed that there was only one birth story, having seen different versions merged into one on Christmas Eve in our small Methodist church in California, when we acted out the children’s pageant, dressed as angels crowned with sparkling halos, or shepherds or kings with paper crowns, arriving to greet the baby Jesus, a doll cradled by the girl who’d scored the role of Mary. But when I went back to investigate the birth story, I was amazed to see that, although the New Testament gospels of Matthew and Luke agree that Jesus was a royal prince, born in Bethlehem, and that heavenly signs announced his birth, at nearly every other point each tells a very different story.
I was also surprised to see that the earliest written narrative of Jesus’s life in the Bible, the Gospel of Mark, tells us nothing about the circumstances of his birth, and nearly nothing about his family background. The same is true of the last of the four New Testament gospels, the Gospel of John, but the other two, the Gospel of Luke and the Gospel of Matthew, tell us a great deal, each offering many details.
Both Luke and Matthew start by telling of Jesus’s family and lineage, and relating the circumstances of his birth and youth. Each offers a genealogy that traces Jesus’s paternal descent from his father, Joseph, to Israel’s royal dynasty, back to King David, circa 1000 b.c.e. As we’ve noted, both locate Jesus’s birth in Bethlehem, the city native to Israel’s kings. Both also claim that Jesus’s parents received divine visions about their future child and his destiny—heavenly signs, astrological portents that signified the arrival of a divinely appointed “Son of God.” Most amazing of all, both Matthew and Luke insist that Jesus’s birth involved a miracle unprecedented in the history of the world—a “virgin birth.”
To understand what each writer has in mind, we need to read these stories separately. Matthew begins by announcing that Jesus is God’s chosen Messiah, setting forth a genealogy that shows his descent from Israel’s greatest kings, David and Solomon. Then he tells how magi, astrologers from foreign lands, alerted by the appearance of a new star signaling the birth of a future king, travel to Jerusalem bearing royal gifts to honor the newborn prince. But news of the birth of a potential rival terrifies the reigning king, Herod the Great. After convening his entire court, he summons the foreign ambassadors, ordering them to find the child and return to tell Herod how to locate him.
Although a familiar story in Luke’s gospel pictures Jesus’s parents traveling to Bethlehem, seeking an inn, and finding none, Matthew, surprisingly, says that his parents had a house in Bethlehem, ancestral city of the Davidic dynasty. Then, he says, the heavenly sign, the Christmas star, led the magi to their home (Matthew 2:10). Overwhelmed with joy, they enter the house and, seeing the child with Mary, his mother, kneel down to pay homage, opening their treasure chests to offer gold, frankincense, and myrrh. But after they secretly depart from Jerusalem, eluding Herod, the enraged king orders his soldiers to slaughter all male Jewish babies under the age of two—a fate Jesus escapes only because his father, Joseph, immediately takes his family into hiding in Egypt. Only later, after hearing of Herod’s death, does Joseph dare return with his wife and child. But, fearing that Herod’s son and successor also might threaten the child’s life, Joseph moves the holy family from their home in Bethlehem to a rural town in Galilee, where they live incognito until Jesus grows up. As Matthew tells it, this explains why, instead of being recognized as a prince, he is known simply as Jesus of Nazareth (2:22–23).
Luke, too, says a lot about Jesus’s family and birth; but, as we’ve noted, he tells quite a different story. Instead of a royal birth heralded by a divine sign recognized by kings and rulers throughout the world, Luke mentions no star, and no public alarm. Instead, he pictures a pregnant young woman from a rural family, who went into labor while traveling away from home. Having nowhere else to stay in Bethlehem, she and her husband took shelter in a barn, and Jesus’s mother had to give birth in a manger; only local herdsmen took note of what happened. But since Luke, like Matthew, insists that Jesus’s father was related to Israel’s royal dynasty, he says that Mary and Joseph had traveled to Bethlehem, claiming that members of that family were required to pay Roman taxes there.
As Luke tells it, Mary, astonished when the angel Gabriel appears to her to say that she is about to become pregnant, exclaims, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” Reading Luke’s account as an adult raised questions that hadn’t occurred to me before. Many Christians love and revere Mary, not only as “Mother of God” but also as someone whose loving-kindness and purity Christian women might seek to emulate. But now, rereading Luke’s story, I had to consider other possibilities. What if we suspend, for a moment, the happy fiction Luke presents, and consider how a young woman receiving such a message might actually respond? Isn’t it likely that a girl with no sexual experience might be startled and dismayed to hear that she is about to become pregnant, given the potential embarrassment and shame she might suffer? Luke is a writer who, unlike Matthew, focuses on Mary, and wants us to imagine her surprised and delighted. Yet the dialogue he puts in her mouth suggests that she is overwhelmed and simply acquiesces, declaring, “I am the Lord’s slave; so be it” (Luke 1:38). Luke’s choice of words, the Greek doulē, “slave,” is often translated into softer terms, like “servant” or the English word “handmaiden.” But those hearing this story in Luke’s time would likely know that an enslaved woman was required to obey a master’s will, even when that meant bearing his child, as it often did. Luke intends to show, however, that the Lord himself could turn a burden into a blessing, even for Mary.
For over two thousand years, Christians throughout the world have merged the two stories into one, to create a composite version that ignores their discrepancies. For, although both birth stories agree on three points—Jesus’s lineage, the location in Bethlehem, a miraculous birth—there the similarities end and difficulties begin. And although historians have sought for millennia to verify details of these stories, they have found none—none for Matthew’s claim of an unusual astronomical sign; none for any historical record that hints at a massive slaughter of Jewish babies; and none to validate Luke’s claim that Jesus’s family would have had to pay Roman taxes in Bethlehem. So, when the Roman Catholic scholar Raymond Brown considers the “star” Matthew mentions, he notes that, though ancient Babylonian astrologers “might have associated a particular star with the King of the Jews,” there are no records of such an event, or even of such a prediction. Brown does suggest that many of Matthew’s contemporaries might have accepted his account, since Roman biographers often associated the sighting of special astronomical signs with the births of great rulers. For example, a silver coin honoring Julius Caesar (c. 40 b.c.e.) portrays him with a special star that signals his divine destiny.
In the seventeenth century, European scientists began to sift through evidence of unusual celestial events, seeking scientific evidence for the “star.” The astronomer Johannes Kepler suggested that it must have been a supernova, although there is no record of one from that time. Others have suggested that the star may have been a comet, perhaps Halley’s Comet, which appeared in 12 b.c.e. Later, however, when Kepler sighted a conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn, he noted that the same conjunction, predicted to occur every 805 years, may have happened in 7 b.c.e., when it appeared in the constellation Pisces, and so may have been the Christmas star—a view that some endorse to this day.
Yet, since such speculation is far from conclusive, literary scholars suggest instead that, rather than speaking of astronomical “facts,” Matthew assimilated into his narrative the poetic language of such prophets as Isaiah. Writing six hundred years before Jesus’s birth, Isaiah envisioned that when the “day of the Lord” dawned, Gentiles would travel to the holy land of Israel, bearing “the wealth of the nations,” along with camels and flocks of sheep, bringing offerings of “gold and frankincense” to honor the dawning of the “great light” of God’s glory (Isaiah 60:1–7) . If that is what prompts Matthew to write the “Christmas star” into his birth narrative, his likely intention is not to deceive his audience into believing something that didn’t happen. Instead, convinced that Jesus was, indeed, God’s promised Messiah, Matthew may have assumed that events coinciding with his birth would have fulfilled ancient prophecies. And since Matthew intended not only to write a narrative of Jesus’s life but above all to show the meaning of his birth and his life, he may well have adopted Isaiah’s metaphor, picturing Jesus’s birth as the light of a new dawn.
What about Matthew’s claim that King Herod ordered his soldiers to slaughter Jewish babies? As noted, historians of the early Roman Empire have searched in vain for any hint of such a government-ordered massacre. Yet Herod was famous for his cruelty, which may have made such a story sound plausible. When he suspected two of his sons, Alexander and Aristobulus, of plotting against him, Herod ordered his executioners to kill them both; he had previously executed their mother, Mariamne, his favorite wife, under similar charges. After that, a popular saying mocked his professed refusal to eat nonkosher food: “Better to be Herod’s pig than his son!” Nevertheless, nearly all historians agree that the unprecedented mass killing that Matthew claims to report could not have occurred without any trace remaining in Jewish or Roman historical records.
Instead, here again, as in the case of the “Christmas star,” many scholars agree that Matthew models his story of Jesus’s birth on literary precedent—on famous passages in the Hebrew Bible, to suggest, for example, that, just as the infant Moses escaped the Egyptian pharaoh’s mass slaughter of Jewish babies, so the infant Jesus barely escaped a similar massacre under King Herod (Matthew 2:8–18). As for the third event, which Luke reports—that Mary and Joseph had to travel to Bethlehem to register for taxes—historians of Rome note that, although Roman rulers did inflict severe taxes on Jews around the time of Jesus’s birth, they imposed no such travel requirement. So, here again, literary scholars join the discussion, suggesting that Luke includes this detail in order to move Jesus’s parents from their home in Nazareth to Bethlehem in time for his birth, to fulfill the Hebrew Bible prophecies of a Messiah’s birthplace.
Matthew’s and Luke’s birth narratives, then, likely contain more literary adaptation of Hebrew Bible stories than history. This similarity between their gospels shows that, although the New Testament writers often mention historical events, they were not writing primarily to report history, or even biography—not, at any rate, in ways that conform to Greek and Roman literary conventions. Instead, they were writing, some forty to seventy years after Jesus’s death, primarily to publicize his message. Simply put, Jesus’s devoted believers wrote these narratives to persuade others to “believe in the gospel”—the Greek term euangelion translates as “good news”—and join their new movement.
The gospels, then, have that motivation in common. But when we think of these writings as less than factual, written, in effect, as propaganda for the movement (intending that term as descriptive, not pejorative), we begin to question startling discrepancies between them. The earliest written sources that mention Jesus—the letters of Paul, and the New Testament gospels—all mention his mother. But apart from the two birth stories we’ve noted in Matthew and Luke, only John’s gospel briefly mentions Joseph as Jesus’s father. Neither Paul nor Mark ever mentions Joseph’s name, and neither mentions any human father. Noting this absence, Professor Raymond Brown has speculated that Joseph is not a historical figure. He suggests instead that Matthew may have patterned what he writes of Joseph’s receiving messages from angels in his dreams on the Hebrew Bible story of Joseph “the dreamer,” told in Genesis 37. But if Joseph was not Jesus’s father, who was? As we shall see, many respected scholars regard the birth stories primarily as legends woven from Biblical stories in order to deflect that embarrassing question.
The mystery begins with Jesus’s genealogy. We’ve noted that Matthew begins his account with one genealogy, and Luke adds another—which raises questions we need to investigate. Both claim to trace Jesus’s lineage back to King David, but when we compare them, we cannot help noting that these two accounts clash from the start. Immediately after mentioning Joseph as Jesus’s father, each names a different man as Jesus’s paternal grandfather; and after that, the two genealogies continue to diverge at nearly every turn (Matthew 1:1–18; Luke 3:23–38). Finally, whereas Matthew claims to trace Jesus’s lineage back to Abraham, Luke goes further, claiming to trace it back to Adam, ancestor of the human race, whom he calls “son of God”—a term he also applies to Jesus.
A confusing genealogy is one thing; the bigger question is, why do both writers insist on Jesus’s “virgin birth”? Matthew admits that Joseph himself found this claim so outrageous that when he discovered that his future bride was pregnant, and not with his child, he immediately decided to break the marriage contract (Matthew 1:18–19). At this point in Luke’s story, however, he mentions nothing of marital discord. On the contrary, Luke wants to interpret what happened as miraculous, an enormous blessing. As he tells it, a young girl who “has never known a man” suddenly, astonishingly, discovers that God has graced her with a unique role in human history. Bursting with joy, she begins to sing a song of praise to God.
Details:
Visit the Doubleday Store
Miracles and Wonder: The Historical Mystery of Jesus
Product ID: U0385547463
Condition: New
AED14494
Price includes VAT & Import Duties
Type: Hardcover
Availability: In Stock
Quantity:
|
Order today to get by 7-14 business days
Delivery fee of AED 20. Free for orders above AED 200.
Imported From: United States
At BOLO, we work hard to ensure the products you receive are new, genuine, and sourced from reputable suppliers.
Every product in the BOLO catalogue is sourced through our Verified Global Supply Network of verified sellers, authorized distributors or directly from the manufacturer.
Each product undergoes thorough inspection and verification at our consolidation and fulfilment centers to ensure it meets our strict authenticity and quality standards before being shipped and delivered to you.
If you ever have concerns regarding the authenticity of a product purchased from us, please contact Bolo Support. We will review your inquiry promptly and, if necessary, provide documentation verifying authenticity or offer a suitable resolution.
Your trust is our top priority, and we are committed to maintaining transparency and integrity in every transaction.
While we strive to display accurate information, variations in packaging, labeling, instructions, or formulation may occasionally occur due to regional differences or supplier updates. For detailed or manufacturer-specific information, please contact the brand directly or reach out to BOLO Support for assistance.
Unless otherwise stated, all prices displayed on the product page include applicable taxes and import duties.
BOLO operates in accordance with the laws and regulations of United Arab Emirates. Any items found to be restricted or prohibited for sale within the United Arab Emirates will be cancelled prior to shipment. We take proactive measures to ensure that only products permitted for sale in United Arab Emirates are listed on our website.
All items are shipped by air, and any products classified as “Dangerous Goods (DG)” under IATA regulations will be removed from the order and cancelled.
All orders are processed manually, and we make every effort to process them promptly once confirmed. Products cancelled due to the above reasons will be permanently removed from listings across the website.
Similar suggestions by Bolo
Share with
Or share with link
https://www.bolo.ae/products/U0385547463
Visit the Doubleday Store
Miracles and Wonder: The Historical Mystery of Jesus
Product ID: U0385547463
Condition: New
Type: Hardcover
AED14494
Price includes VAT & Import Duties
Availability: In Stock
Quantity:
|
Order today to get by 7-14 business days
Delivery fee of AED 20. Free for orders above AED 200.
Imported From: United States
At BOLO, we work hard to ensure the products you receive are new, genuine, and sourced from reputable suppliers.
Every product in the BOLO catalogue is sourced through our Verified Global Supply Network of verified sellers, authorized distributors or directly from the manufacturer.
Each product undergoes thorough inspection and verification at our consolidation and fulfilment centers to ensure it meets our strict authenticity and quality standards before being shipped and delivered to you.
If you ever have concerns regarding the authenticity of a product purchased from us, please contact Bolo Support. We will review your inquiry promptly and, if necessary, provide documentation verifying authenticity or offer a suitable resolution.
Your trust is our top priority, and we are committed to maintaining transparency and integrity in every transaction.
While we strive to display accurate information, variations in packaging, labeling, instructions, or formulation may occasionally occur due to regional differences or supplier updates. For detailed or manufacturer-specific information, please contact the brand directly or reach out to BOLO Support for assistance.
Unless otherwise stated, all prices displayed on the product page include applicable taxes and import duties.
BOLO operates in accordance with the laws and regulations of United Arab Emirates. Any items found to be restricted or prohibited for sale within the United Arab Emirates will be cancelled prior to shipment. We take proactive measures to ensure that only products permitted for sale in United Arab Emirates are listed on our website.
All items are shipped by air, and any products classified as “Dangerous Goods (DG)” under IATA regulations will be removed from the order and cancelled.
All orders are processed manually, and we make every effort to process them promptly once confirmed. Products cancelled due to the above reasons will be permanently removed from listings across the website.
Description:
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From a renowned National Book Award–winning scholar, an extraordinary new account of the life of Jesus that explores the mystery of how a poor young man inspired a religion that reshaped the world.
“This a brilliant and necessary book. Sober, wise, respectful, and fearless." —Jon Meacham, author of The Soul of America
"Pagels’ story is for believers and non-believers alike.” —Tara Westover, author of Educated
"The depth of spirituality she uncovers is profound.” —The New York Times Book Review
Early in her career, Elaine Pagels changed our understanding of the origins of Christianity with her work in The Gnostic Gospels. Now, in the culmination of a decades-long career, she explores the biggest subject of all, Jesus. In Miracles and Wonder she sets out to discover how a poor young Jewish man inspired a religion that shaped the world.
The book reads like a historical mystery, with each chapter addressing a fascinating question and answering it based on the gospels Jesus's followers left behind. Why is Jesus said to have had a virgin birth? Why do we say he rose from the dead? Did his miracles really happen and what did they mean?
The story Pagels tells is thrilling and tense. Not just does Jesus comes to life but his desperate, hunted followers do as well. We realize that some of the most compelling details of Jesus's life are the explanations his disciples created to paper over inconvenient facts. So Jesus wasn't illegitimate, his mother conceived by God; Jesus's body wasn't humiliatingly left to rot and tossed into a common grave—no, he rose from the dead and was seen whole by his followers; Jesus isn't a failed messiah, his kingdom is a metaphor: he lives in us. These necessary fabrications were the very details and promises that electrified their listeners and helped his followers' numbers grow.
In Miracles and Wonder, Pagels does more than solve a historical mystery. She sheds light on Jesus's enduring power to inspire and attract.
“This a brilliant and necessary book. Sober, wise, respectful, and fearless." —Jon Meacham, author of The Soul of America
"Pagels’ story is for believers and non-believers alike.” —Tara Westover, author of Educated
"The depth of spirituality she uncovers is profound.” —The New York Times Book Review
Early in her career, Elaine Pagels changed our understanding of the origins of Christianity with her work in The Gnostic Gospels. Now, in the culmination of a decades-long career, she explores the biggest subject of all, Jesus. In Miracles and Wonder she sets out to discover how a poor young Jewish man inspired a religion that shaped the world.
The book reads like a historical mystery, with each chapter addressing a fascinating question and answering it based on the gospels Jesus's followers left behind. Why is Jesus said to have had a virgin birth? Why do we say he rose from the dead? Did his miracles really happen and what did they mean?
The story Pagels tells is thrilling and tense. Not just does Jesus comes to life but his desperate, hunted followers do as well. We realize that some of the most compelling details of Jesus's life are the explanations his disciples created to paper over inconvenient facts. So Jesus wasn't illegitimate, his mother conceived by God; Jesus's body wasn't humiliatingly left to rot and tossed into a common grave—no, he rose from the dead and was seen whole by his followers; Jesus isn't a failed messiah, his kingdom is a metaphor: he lives in us. These necessary fabrications were the very details and promises that electrified their listeners and helped his followers' numbers grow.
In Miracles and Wonder, Pagels does more than solve a historical mystery. She sheds light on Jesus's enduring power to inspire and attract.
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Pagels, rehabilitating aspects of Christianity on terms that a secular scholar can respect, revels in the contradictions and the inconsistencies not as flaws to be explained away but as signs of the faith’s capaciousness.” —Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker
“The ‘quest’ for Jesus . . . has taken on many forms. Pagels takes the historical approach. . . . The depth of spirituality she uncovers is profound.” —The New York Times Book Review
"[Pagels's] vast knowledge has always been tempered by deep humility. . . . [Here is] an opportunity to hurry along with a scholar of tremendous graciousness and think together about some of the most profound and inspiring stories ever told. Regardless of what you believe -- or don't believe -- this is an author hoping to convince you of nothing but the "outburst of hope" conveyed by the multitudinous voices of Jesus's early followers." —The Washington Post
"Using the tools of the historian as well as the literary critic, she tries to unearth the [gospel] writers’ concerns and influences. . . . recontextualizing the old stories gives them an unexpected poignancy." —The Atlantic
"Miracles and Wonder explores mysteries about Jesus with detective zeal. . . . illuminating and essential work." —Los Angeles Times
“Pagels’s book advances a refreshingly honest reminder about why the stories of Jesus . . . haven’t gone away.” —Los Angeles Review of Books
"[T]his title is notable not just for the depth and breadth of Pagel’s scholarship but for the way she becomes part of the story. There is almost a yearning to her quest for answers that personalizes her writing. . . . Part history, part mystery, all enlightening." —Booklist (starred review)
"No matter how familiar readers are with the gospels, the stories Pagels has woven together offer new takes on who Jesus was and what it means to bring facts to faith with clarity and curiosity." —Library Journal
“Few scholars on the planet have entranced, enthralled, and educated readers about early Christianity as much as Elaine Pagels. Now she turns her gaze to the very core of the Christian faith, the mysterious life of Jesus himself. Miracles and Wonders will delight readers with Pagels’ endless curiosity, keen insights, and poignant reflections.” —Bart D. Ehrman, author of Misquoting Jesus and host of the Misquoting Jesus podcast
“This a brilliant and necessary book. Sober, wise, respectful, and fearless, Elaine Pagels’ account of her exploration into the history and meaning of Jesus is akin to having a long, rich, and illuminating conversation with a friend who has read everything and is eager to share what she’s learned.” —Jon Meacham, author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, The Soul of America
“Provocative, gracious, reverent: a great historian of religion gives us an account of the life of Jesus, one of history's most towering figures. Scholarly and inquisitive, but also contemplative and respectful, Pagels’ story is for believers and non-believers alike.” —Tara Westover, author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, Educated
“With her vast learning worn lightly, easily, Elaine Pagels offers a luminous and profound historical meditation on Jesus and the gospels. Interpreting a jumble of ancient sacred stories with utmost care and respect, she discerns the patterns that finally bring hope and even redemption to an afflicted world -- a major reason these stories live and inspire faith.” —Sean Wilentz, George Henry Davis 1886 Professor of American History at Princeton University
“With Miracles and Wonder, Elaine Pagels, one of our nation’s greatest historians of religion, has penned an intimate and deeply researched history of the life and significance of Jesus. With clarity and care, she unsettles and reorients the reader. She shows us that the enduring power of Jesus rests in the “outburst of hope” that emanates from the stories about him. Hope we so desperately need in our own dark and trying times.” —Eddie S. Glaude, Jr., author of Begin Again: James Baldwin’s America and Its Urgent Lessons for Our Own
“The ‘quest’ for Jesus . . . has taken on many forms. Pagels takes the historical approach. . . . The depth of spirituality she uncovers is profound.” —The New York Times Book Review
"[Pagels's] vast knowledge has always been tempered by deep humility. . . . [Here is] an opportunity to hurry along with a scholar of tremendous graciousness and think together about some of the most profound and inspiring stories ever told. Regardless of what you believe -- or don't believe -- this is an author hoping to convince you of nothing but the "outburst of hope" conveyed by the multitudinous voices of Jesus's early followers." —The Washington Post
"Using the tools of the historian as well as the literary critic, she tries to unearth the [gospel] writers’ concerns and influences. . . . recontextualizing the old stories gives them an unexpected poignancy." —The Atlantic
"Miracles and Wonder explores mysteries about Jesus with detective zeal. . . . illuminating and essential work." —Los Angeles Times
“Pagels’s book advances a refreshingly honest reminder about why the stories of Jesus . . . haven’t gone away.” —Los Angeles Review of Books
"[T]his title is notable not just for the depth and breadth of Pagel’s scholarship but for the way she becomes part of the story. There is almost a yearning to her quest for answers that personalizes her writing. . . . Part history, part mystery, all enlightening." —Booklist (starred review)
"No matter how familiar readers are with the gospels, the stories Pagels has woven together offer new takes on who Jesus was and what it means to bring facts to faith with clarity and curiosity." —Library Journal
“Few scholars on the planet have entranced, enthralled, and educated readers about early Christianity as much as Elaine Pagels. Now she turns her gaze to the very core of the Christian faith, the mysterious life of Jesus himself. Miracles and Wonders will delight readers with Pagels’ endless curiosity, keen insights, and poignant reflections.” —Bart D. Ehrman, author of Misquoting Jesus and host of the Misquoting Jesus podcast
“This a brilliant and necessary book. Sober, wise, respectful, and fearless, Elaine Pagels’ account of her exploration into the history and meaning of Jesus is akin to having a long, rich, and illuminating conversation with a friend who has read everything and is eager to share what she’s learned.” —Jon Meacham, author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, The Soul of America
“Provocative, gracious, reverent: a great historian of religion gives us an account of the life of Jesus, one of history's most towering figures. Scholarly and inquisitive, but also contemplative and respectful, Pagels’ story is for believers and non-believers alike.” —Tara Westover, author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, Educated
“With her vast learning worn lightly, easily, Elaine Pagels offers a luminous and profound historical meditation on Jesus and the gospels. Interpreting a jumble of ancient sacred stories with utmost care and respect, she discerns the patterns that finally bring hope and even redemption to an afflicted world -- a major reason these stories live and inspire faith.” —Sean Wilentz, George Henry Davis 1886 Professor of American History at Princeton University
“With Miracles and Wonder, Elaine Pagels, one of our nation’s greatest historians of religion, has penned an intimate and deeply researched history of the life and significance of Jesus. With clarity and care, she unsettles and reorients the reader. She shows us that the enduring power of Jesus rests in the “outburst of hope” that emanates from the stories about him. Hope we so desperately need in our own dark and trying times.” —Eddie S. Glaude, Jr., author of Begin Again: James Baldwin’s America and Its Urgent Lessons for Our Own
About the Author
ELAINE PAGELS is the Harrington Spear Paine Professor of Religion at Princeton University. In 2015 she received the National Humanities Medal from President Barack Obama, and earlier in her career was awarded a Rockefeller, Guggenheim, and MacArthur fellowship in consecutive years. As a young researcher at Barnard College, she changed the historical landscape of the Christian religion by exploding the myth of the early Church as a unified movement. Her findings were published in the bestselling book The Gnostic Gospels (1979), which won both the National Book Critics Circle Award and the National Book Award. Her subsequent books include Why Religion? Revelations, Reading Judas, Beyond Belief, The Origin of Satan, and Adam, Eve, and the Serpent. She has been profiled in Time, The Atlantic, Vogue, The New Yorker, and Newsweek's issue "Women and Power."
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
1
The Virgin Birth: What Happened?
Jesus’s Family and the Circumstances of His Birth
Perhaps the most unusual feature of the gospel stories is the virgin birth: What might it mean? How do the gospel writers say that it happened, and why? When I first started to ask these questions, I found many surprises. I’d always assumed that there was only one birth story, having seen different versions merged into one on Christmas Eve in our small Methodist church in California, when we acted out the children’s pageant, dressed as angels crowned with sparkling halos, or shepherds or kings with paper crowns, arriving to greet the baby Jesus, a doll cradled by the girl who’d scored the role of Mary. But when I went back to investigate the birth story, I was amazed to see that, although the New Testament gospels of Matthew and Luke agree that Jesus was a royal prince, born in Bethlehem, and that heavenly signs announced his birth, at nearly every other point each tells a very different story.
I was also surprised to see that the earliest written narrative of Jesus’s life in the Bible, the Gospel of Mark, tells us nothing about the circumstances of his birth, and nearly nothing about his family background. The same is true of the last of the four New Testament gospels, the Gospel of John, but the other two, the Gospel of Luke and the Gospel of Matthew, tell us a great deal, each offering many details.
Both Luke and Matthew start by telling of Jesus’s family and lineage, and relating the circumstances of his birth and youth. Each offers a genealogy that traces Jesus’s paternal descent from his father, Joseph, to Israel’s royal dynasty, back to King David, circa 1000 b.c.e. As we’ve noted, both locate Jesus’s birth in Bethlehem, the city native to Israel’s kings. Both also claim that Jesus’s parents received divine visions about their future child and his destiny—heavenly signs, astrological portents that signified the arrival of a divinely appointed “Son of God.” Most amazing of all, both Matthew and Luke insist that Jesus’s birth involved a miracle unprecedented in the history of the world—a “virgin birth.”
To understand what each writer has in mind, we need to read these stories separately. Matthew begins by announcing that Jesus is God’s chosen Messiah, setting forth a genealogy that shows his descent from Israel’s greatest kings, David and Solomon. Then he tells how magi, astrologers from foreign lands, alerted by the appearance of a new star signaling the birth of a future king, travel to Jerusalem bearing royal gifts to honor the newborn prince. But news of the birth of a potential rival terrifies the reigning king, Herod the Great. After convening his entire court, he summons the foreign ambassadors, ordering them to find the child and return to tell Herod how to locate him.
Although a familiar story in Luke’s gospel pictures Jesus’s parents traveling to Bethlehem, seeking an inn, and finding none, Matthew, surprisingly, says that his parents had a house in Bethlehem, ancestral city of the Davidic dynasty. Then, he says, the heavenly sign, the Christmas star, led the magi to their home (Matthew 2:10). Overwhelmed with joy, they enter the house and, seeing the child with Mary, his mother, kneel down to pay homage, opening their treasure chests to offer gold, frankincense, and myrrh. But after they secretly depart from Jerusalem, eluding Herod, the enraged king orders his soldiers to slaughter all male Jewish babies under the age of two—a fate Jesus escapes only because his father, Joseph, immediately takes his family into hiding in Egypt. Only later, after hearing of Herod’s death, does Joseph dare return with his wife and child. But, fearing that Herod’s son and successor also might threaten the child’s life, Joseph moves the holy family from their home in Bethlehem to a rural town in Galilee, where they live incognito until Jesus grows up. As Matthew tells it, this explains why, instead of being recognized as a prince, he is known simply as Jesus of Nazareth (2:22–23).
Luke, too, says a lot about Jesus’s family and birth; but, as we’ve noted, he tells quite a different story. Instead of a royal birth heralded by a divine sign recognized by kings and rulers throughout the world, Luke mentions no star, and no public alarm. Instead, he pictures a pregnant young woman from a rural family, who went into labor while traveling away from home. Having nowhere else to stay in Bethlehem, she and her husband took shelter in a barn, and Jesus’s mother had to give birth in a manger; only local herdsmen took note of what happened. But since Luke, like Matthew, insists that Jesus’s father was related to Israel’s royal dynasty, he says that Mary and Joseph had traveled to Bethlehem, claiming that members of that family were required to pay Roman taxes there.
As Luke tells it, Mary, astonished when the angel Gabriel appears to her to say that she is about to become pregnant, exclaims, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” Reading Luke’s account as an adult raised questions that hadn’t occurred to me before. Many Christians love and revere Mary, not only as “Mother of God” but also as someone whose loving-kindness and purity Christian women might seek to emulate. But now, rereading Luke’s story, I had to consider other possibilities. What if we suspend, for a moment, the happy fiction Luke presents, and consider how a young woman receiving such a message might actually respond? Isn’t it likely that a girl with no sexual experience might be startled and dismayed to hear that she is about to become pregnant, given the potential embarrassment and shame she might suffer? Luke is a writer who, unlike Matthew, focuses on Mary, and wants us to imagine her surprised and delighted. Yet the dialogue he puts in her mouth suggests that she is overwhelmed and simply acquiesces, declaring, “I am the Lord’s slave; so be it” (Luke 1:38). Luke’s choice of words, the Greek doulē, “slave,” is often translated into softer terms, like “servant” or the English word “handmaiden.” But those hearing this story in Luke’s time would likely know that an enslaved woman was required to obey a master’s will, even when that meant bearing his child, as it often did. Luke intends to show, however, that the Lord himself could turn a burden into a blessing, even for Mary.
For over two thousand years, Christians throughout the world have merged the two stories into one, to create a composite version that ignores their discrepancies. For, although both birth stories agree on three points—Jesus’s lineage, the location in Bethlehem, a miraculous birth—there the similarities end and difficulties begin. And although historians have sought for millennia to verify details of these stories, they have found none—none for Matthew’s claim of an unusual astronomical sign; none for any historical record that hints at a massive slaughter of Jewish babies; and none to validate Luke’s claim that Jesus’s family would have had to pay Roman taxes in Bethlehem. So, when the Roman Catholic scholar Raymond Brown considers the “star” Matthew mentions, he notes that, though ancient Babylonian astrologers “might have associated a particular star with the King of the Jews,” there are no records of such an event, or even of such a prediction. Brown does suggest that many of Matthew’s contemporaries might have accepted his account, since Roman biographers often associated the sighting of special astronomical signs with the births of great rulers. For example, a silver coin honoring Julius Caesar (c. 40 b.c.e.) portrays him with a special star that signals his divine destiny.
In the seventeenth century, European scientists began to sift through evidence of unusual celestial events, seeking scientific evidence for the “star.” The astronomer Johannes Kepler suggested that it must have been a supernova, although there is no record of one from that time. Others have suggested that the star may have been a comet, perhaps Halley’s Comet, which appeared in 12 b.c.e. Later, however, when Kepler sighted a conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn, he noted that the same conjunction, predicted to occur every 805 years, may have happened in 7 b.c.e., when it appeared in the constellation Pisces, and so may have been the Christmas star—a view that some endorse to this day.
Yet, since such speculation is far from conclusive, literary scholars suggest instead that, rather than speaking of astronomical “facts,” Matthew assimilated into his narrative the poetic language of such prophets as Isaiah. Writing six hundred years before Jesus’s birth, Isaiah envisioned that when the “day of the Lord” dawned, Gentiles would travel to the holy land of Israel, bearing “the wealth of the nations,” along with camels and flocks of sheep, bringing offerings of “gold and frankincense” to honor the dawning of the “great light” of God’s glory (Isaiah 60:1–7) . If that is what prompts Matthew to write the “Christmas star” into his birth narrative, his likely intention is not to deceive his audience into believing something that didn’t happen. Instead, convinced that Jesus was, indeed, God’s promised Messiah, Matthew may have assumed that events coinciding with his birth would have fulfilled ancient prophecies. And since Matthew intended not only to write a narrative of Jesus’s life but above all to show the meaning of his birth and his life, he may well have adopted Isaiah’s metaphor, picturing Jesus’s birth as the light of a new dawn.
What about Matthew’s claim that King Herod ordered his soldiers to slaughter Jewish babies? As noted, historians of the early Roman Empire have searched in vain for any hint of such a government-ordered massacre. Yet Herod was famous for his cruelty, which may have made such a story sound plausible. When he suspected two of his sons, Alexander and Aristobulus, of plotting against him, Herod ordered his executioners to kill them both; he had previously executed their mother, Mariamne, his favorite wife, under similar charges. After that, a popular saying mocked his professed refusal to eat nonkosher food: “Better to be Herod’s pig than his son!” Nevertheless, nearly all historians agree that the unprecedented mass killing that Matthew claims to report could not have occurred without any trace remaining in Jewish or Roman historical records.
Instead, here again, as in the case of the “Christmas star,” many scholars agree that Matthew models his story of Jesus’s birth on literary precedent—on famous passages in the Hebrew Bible, to suggest, for example, that, just as the infant Moses escaped the Egyptian pharaoh’s mass slaughter of Jewish babies, so the infant Jesus barely escaped a similar massacre under King Herod (Matthew 2:8–18). As for the third event, which Luke reports—that Mary and Joseph had to travel to Bethlehem to register for taxes—historians of Rome note that, although Roman rulers did inflict severe taxes on Jews around the time of Jesus’s birth, they imposed no such travel requirement. So, here again, literary scholars join the discussion, suggesting that Luke includes this detail in order to move Jesus’s parents from their home in Nazareth to Bethlehem in time for his birth, to fulfill the Hebrew Bible prophecies of a Messiah’s birthplace.
Matthew’s and Luke’s birth narratives, then, likely contain more literary adaptation of Hebrew Bible stories than history. This similarity between their gospels shows that, although the New Testament writers often mention historical events, they were not writing primarily to report history, or even biography—not, at any rate, in ways that conform to Greek and Roman literary conventions. Instead, they were writing, some forty to seventy years after Jesus’s death, primarily to publicize his message. Simply put, Jesus’s devoted believers wrote these narratives to persuade others to “believe in the gospel”—the Greek term euangelion translates as “good news”—and join their new movement.
The gospels, then, have that motivation in common. But when we think of these writings as less than factual, written, in effect, as propaganda for the movement (intending that term as descriptive, not pejorative), we begin to question startling discrepancies between them. The earliest written sources that mention Jesus—the letters of Paul, and the New Testament gospels—all mention his mother. But apart from the two birth stories we’ve noted in Matthew and Luke, only John’s gospel briefly mentions Joseph as Jesus’s father. Neither Paul nor Mark ever mentions Joseph’s name, and neither mentions any human father. Noting this absence, Professor Raymond Brown has speculated that Joseph is not a historical figure. He suggests instead that Matthew may have patterned what he writes of Joseph’s receiving messages from angels in his dreams on the Hebrew Bible story of Joseph “the dreamer,” told in Genesis 37. But if Joseph was not Jesus’s father, who was? As we shall see, many respected scholars regard the birth stories primarily as legends woven from Biblical stories in order to deflect that embarrassing question.
The mystery begins with Jesus’s genealogy. We’ve noted that Matthew begins his account with one genealogy, and Luke adds another—which raises questions we need to investigate. Both claim to trace Jesus’s lineage back to King David, but when we compare them, we cannot help noting that these two accounts clash from the start. Immediately after mentioning Joseph as Jesus’s father, each names a different man as Jesus’s paternal grandfather; and after that, the two genealogies continue to diverge at nearly every turn (Matthew 1:1–18; Luke 3:23–38). Finally, whereas Matthew claims to trace Jesus’s lineage back to Abraham, Luke goes further, claiming to trace it back to Adam, ancestor of the human race, whom he calls “son of God”—a term he also applies to Jesus.
A confusing genealogy is one thing; the bigger question is, why do both writers insist on Jesus’s “virgin birth”? Matthew admits that Joseph himself found this claim so outrageous that when he discovered that his future bride was pregnant, and not with his child, he immediately decided to break the marriage contract (Matthew 1:18–19). At this point in Luke’s story, however, he mentions nothing of marital discord. On the contrary, Luke wants to interpret what happened as miraculous, an enormous blessing. As he tells it, a young girl who “has never known a man” suddenly, astonishingly, discovers that God has graced her with a unique role in human history. Bursting with joy, she begins to sing a song of praise to God.
The Virgin Birth: What Happened?
Jesus’s Family and the Circumstances of His Birth
Perhaps the most unusual feature of the gospel stories is the virgin birth: What might it mean? How do the gospel writers say that it happened, and why? When I first started to ask these questions, I found many surprises. I’d always assumed that there was only one birth story, having seen different versions merged into one on Christmas Eve in our small Methodist church in California, when we acted out the children’s pageant, dressed as angels crowned with sparkling halos, or shepherds or kings with paper crowns, arriving to greet the baby Jesus, a doll cradled by the girl who’d scored the role of Mary. But when I went back to investigate the birth story, I was amazed to see that, although the New Testament gospels of Matthew and Luke agree that Jesus was a royal prince, born in Bethlehem, and that heavenly signs announced his birth, at nearly every other point each tells a very different story.
I was also surprised to see that the earliest written narrative of Jesus’s life in the Bible, the Gospel of Mark, tells us nothing about the circumstances of his birth, and nearly nothing about his family background. The same is true of the last of the four New Testament gospels, the Gospel of John, but the other two, the Gospel of Luke and the Gospel of Matthew, tell us a great deal, each offering many details.
Both Luke and Matthew start by telling of Jesus’s family and lineage, and relating the circumstances of his birth and youth. Each offers a genealogy that traces Jesus’s paternal descent from his father, Joseph, to Israel’s royal dynasty, back to King David, circa 1000 b.c.e. As we’ve noted, both locate Jesus’s birth in Bethlehem, the city native to Israel’s kings. Both also claim that Jesus’s parents received divine visions about their future child and his destiny—heavenly signs, astrological portents that signified the arrival of a divinely appointed “Son of God.” Most amazing of all, both Matthew and Luke insist that Jesus’s birth involved a miracle unprecedented in the history of the world—a “virgin birth.”
To understand what each writer has in mind, we need to read these stories separately. Matthew begins by announcing that Jesus is God’s chosen Messiah, setting forth a genealogy that shows his descent from Israel’s greatest kings, David and Solomon. Then he tells how magi, astrologers from foreign lands, alerted by the appearance of a new star signaling the birth of a future king, travel to Jerusalem bearing royal gifts to honor the newborn prince. But news of the birth of a potential rival terrifies the reigning king, Herod the Great. After convening his entire court, he summons the foreign ambassadors, ordering them to find the child and return to tell Herod how to locate him.
Although a familiar story in Luke’s gospel pictures Jesus’s parents traveling to Bethlehem, seeking an inn, and finding none, Matthew, surprisingly, says that his parents had a house in Bethlehem, ancestral city of the Davidic dynasty. Then, he says, the heavenly sign, the Christmas star, led the magi to their home (Matthew 2:10). Overwhelmed with joy, they enter the house and, seeing the child with Mary, his mother, kneel down to pay homage, opening their treasure chests to offer gold, frankincense, and myrrh. But after they secretly depart from Jerusalem, eluding Herod, the enraged king orders his soldiers to slaughter all male Jewish babies under the age of two—a fate Jesus escapes only because his father, Joseph, immediately takes his family into hiding in Egypt. Only later, after hearing of Herod’s death, does Joseph dare return with his wife and child. But, fearing that Herod’s son and successor also might threaten the child’s life, Joseph moves the holy family from their home in Bethlehem to a rural town in Galilee, where they live incognito until Jesus grows up. As Matthew tells it, this explains why, instead of being recognized as a prince, he is known simply as Jesus of Nazareth (2:22–23).
Luke, too, says a lot about Jesus’s family and birth; but, as we’ve noted, he tells quite a different story. Instead of a royal birth heralded by a divine sign recognized by kings and rulers throughout the world, Luke mentions no star, and no public alarm. Instead, he pictures a pregnant young woman from a rural family, who went into labor while traveling away from home. Having nowhere else to stay in Bethlehem, she and her husband took shelter in a barn, and Jesus’s mother had to give birth in a manger; only local herdsmen took note of what happened. But since Luke, like Matthew, insists that Jesus’s father was related to Israel’s royal dynasty, he says that Mary and Joseph had traveled to Bethlehem, claiming that members of that family were required to pay Roman taxes there.
As Luke tells it, Mary, astonished when the angel Gabriel appears to her to say that she is about to become pregnant, exclaims, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” Reading Luke’s account as an adult raised questions that hadn’t occurred to me before. Many Christians love and revere Mary, not only as “Mother of God” but also as someone whose loving-kindness and purity Christian women might seek to emulate. But now, rereading Luke’s story, I had to consider other possibilities. What if we suspend, for a moment, the happy fiction Luke presents, and consider how a young woman receiving such a message might actually respond? Isn’t it likely that a girl with no sexual experience might be startled and dismayed to hear that she is about to become pregnant, given the potential embarrassment and shame she might suffer? Luke is a writer who, unlike Matthew, focuses on Mary, and wants us to imagine her surprised and delighted. Yet the dialogue he puts in her mouth suggests that she is overwhelmed and simply acquiesces, declaring, “I am the Lord’s slave; so be it” (Luke 1:38). Luke’s choice of words, the Greek doulē, “slave,” is often translated into softer terms, like “servant” or the English word “handmaiden.” But those hearing this story in Luke’s time would likely know that an enslaved woman was required to obey a master’s will, even when that meant bearing his child, as it often did. Luke intends to show, however, that the Lord himself could turn a burden into a blessing, even for Mary.
For over two thousand years, Christians throughout the world have merged the two stories into one, to create a composite version that ignores their discrepancies. For, although both birth stories agree on three points—Jesus’s lineage, the location in Bethlehem, a miraculous birth—there the similarities end and difficulties begin. And although historians have sought for millennia to verify details of these stories, they have found none—none for Matthew’s claim of an unusual astronomical sign; none for any historical record that hints at a massive slaughter of Jewish babies; and none to validate Luke’s claim that Jesus’s family would have had to pay Roman taxes in Bethlehem. So, when the Roman Catholic scholar Raymond Brown considers the “star” Matthew mentions, he notes that, though ancient Babylonian astrologers “might have associated a particular star with the King of the Jews,” there are no records of such an event, or even of such a prediction. Brown does suggest that many of Matthew’s contemporaries might have accepted his account, since Roman biographers often associated the sighting of special astronomical signs with the births of great rulers. For example, a silver coin honoring Julius Caesar (c. 40 b.c.e.) portrays him with a special star that signals his divine destiny.
In the seventeenth century, European scientists began to sift through evidence of unusual celestial events, seeking scientific evidence for the “star.” The astronomer Johannes Kepler suggested that it must have been a supernova, although there is no record of one from that time. Others have suggested that the star may have been a comet, perhaps Halley’s Comet, which appeared in 12 b.c.e. Later, however, when Kepler sighted a conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn, he noted that the same conjunction, predicted to occur every 805 years, may have happened in 7 b.c.e., when it appeared in the constellation Pisces, and so may have been the Christmas star—a view that some endorse to this day.
Yet, since such speculation is far from conclusive, literary scholars suggest instead that, rather than speaking of astronomical “facts,” Matthew assimilated into his narrative the poetic language of such prophets as Isaiah. Writing six hundred years before Jesus’s birth, Isaiah envisioned that when the “day of the Lord” dawned, Gentiles would travel to the holy land of Israel, bearing “the wealth of the nations,” along with camels and flocks of sheep, bringing offerings of “gold and frankincense” to honor the dawning of the “great light” of God’s glory (Isaiah 60:1–7) . If that is what prompts Matthew to write the “Christmas star” into his birth narrative, his likely intention is not to deceive his audience into believing something that didn’t happen. Instead, convinced that Jesus was, indeed, God’s promised Messiah, Matthew may have assumed that events coinciding with his birth would have fulfilled ancient prophecies. And since Matthew intended not only to write a narrative of Jesus’s life but above all to show the meaning of his birth and his life, he may well have adopted Isaiah’s metaphor, picturing Jesus’s birth as the light of a new dawn.
What about Matthew’s claim that King Herod ordered his soldiers to slaughter Jewish babies? As noted, historians of the early Roman Empire have searched in vain for any hint of such a government-ordered massacre. Yet Herod was famous for his cruelty, which may have made such a story sound plausible. When he suspected two of his sons, Alexander and Aristobulus, of plotting against him, Herod ordered his executioners to kill them both; he had previously executed their mother, Mariamne, his favorite wife, under similar charges. After that, a popular saying mocked his professed refusal to eat nonkosher food: “Better to be Herod’s pig than his son!” Nevertheless, nearly all historians agree that the unprecedented mass killing that Matthew claims to report could not have occurred without any trace remaining in Jewish or Roman historical records.
Instead, here again, as in the case of the “Christmas star,” many scholars agree that Matthew models his story of Jesus’s birth on literary precedent—on famous passages in the Hebrew Bible, to suggest, for example, that, just as the infant Moses escaped the Egyptian pharaoh’s mass slaughter of Jewish babies, so the infant Jesus barely escaped a similar massacre under King Herod (Matthew 2:8–18). As for the third event, which Luke reports—that Mary and Joseph had to travel to Bethlehem to register for taxes—historians of Rome note that, although Roman rulers did inflict severe taxes on Jews around the time of Jesus’s birth, they imposed no such travel requirement. So, here again, literary scholars join the discussion, suggesting that Luke includes this detail in order to move Jesus’s parents from their home in Nazareth to Bethlehem in time for his birth, to fulfill the Hebrew Bible prophecies of a Messiah’s birthplace.
Matthew’s and Luke’s birth narratives, then, likely contain more literary adaptation of Hebrew Bible stories than history. This similarity between their gospels shows that, although the New Testament writers often mention historical events, they were not writing primarily to report history, or even biography—not, at any rate, in ways that conform to Greek and Roman literary conventions. Instead, they were writing, some forty to seventy years after Jesus’s death, primarily to publicize his message. Simply put, Jesus’s devoted believers wrote these narratives to persuade others to “believe in the gospel”—the Greek term euangelion translates as “good news”—and join their new movement.
The gospels, then, have that motivation in common. But when we think of these writings as less than factual, written, in effect, as propaganda for the movement (intending that term as descriptive, not pejorative), we begin to question startling discrepancies between them. The earliest written sources that mention Jesus—the letters of Paul, and the New Testament gospels—all mention his mother. But apart from the two birth stories we’ve noted in Matthew and Luke, only John’s gospel briefly mentions Joseph as Jesus’s father. Neither Paul nor Mark ever mentions Joseph’s name, and neither mentions any human father. Noting this absence, Professor Raymond Brown has speculated that Joseph is not a historical figure. He suggests instead that Matthew may have patterned what he writes of Joseph’s receiving messages from angels in his dreams on the Hebrew Bible story of Joseph “the dreamer,” told in Genesis 37. But if Joseph was not Jesus’s father, who was? As we shall see, many respected scholars regard the birth stories primarily as legends woven from Biblical stories in order to deflect that embarrassing question.
The mystery begins with Jesus’s genealogy. We’ve noted that Matthew begins his account with one genealogy, and Luke adds another—which raises questions we need to investigate. Both claim to trace Jesus’s lineage back to King David, but when we compare them, we cannot help noting that these two accounts clash from the start. Immediately after mentioning Joseph as Jesus’s father, each names a different man as Jesus’s paternal grandfather; and after that, the two genealogies continue to diverge at nearly every turn (Matthew 1:1–18; Luke 3:23–38). Finally, whereas Matthew claims to trace Jesus’s lineage back to Abraham, Luke goes further, claiming to trace it back to Adam, ancestor of the human race, whom he calls “son of God”—a term he also applies to Jesus.
A confusing genealogy is one thing; the bigger question is, why do both writers insist on Jesus’s “virgin birth”? Matthew admits that Joseph himself found this claim so outrageous that when he discovered that his future bride was pregnant, and not with his child, he immediately decided to break the marriage contract (Matthew 1:18–19). At this point in Luke’s story, however, he mentions nothing of marital discord. On the contrary, Luke wants to interpret what happened as miraculous, an enormous blessing. As he tells it, a young girl who “has never known a man” suddenly, astonishingly, discovers that God has graced her with a unique role in human history. Bursting with joy, she begins to sing a song of praise to God.
Details:
Similar suggestions by Bolo
Share with
Or share with link
https://www.bolo.ae/products/U0385547463